Specifically, at short distances, a minority of the neurons are coupled rather strongly, whereas such coupling is absent at longer distances. The third layer of bubbles contained findings from our mud map recorded in the photos on my phone that we thought fell under these themes. Despite the local disorder, large-scale organizing principles do exist.
In addition, the strong correlation between the signal correlation of pairs of neurons generally attributed to common inputand the noise correlation between them generally attributed to direct synaptic connections supports a model of strongly coupled subnetworks that share common input.
Of course, in practice writing is not that easy, but this process does help you see the wood instead of the trees. State the major conclusions from your study and present the theoretical and practical implications of your study.
I think we made good progress with a whiteboard in the last meeting and I asked her if I could share what we did with the world, she generously agreed thanks Wendy! If it is the only thing I read, I should get a good understanding of what you found and why it matters.
Do you have any more? Third, heterogeneity was manifested as a lack of local organization according to best frequency Figs.
What works well for you? The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. Although this concern has not been thoroughly ruled out, it seems unlikely because, in at least one study, GABAergic interneuorns were loaded just as efficiently as neighboring pyramidal neurons using similar methodology In other words, for every experimental result you want to talk about, you find results from other publications bearing the relationship to your result that you want the reader to understand.
Writing the Discussion chapter requires taking a few big steps back and seeing the big picture. Specifically, at short distances we observed both very large and very small correlations, while at longer distances we observed only smaller correlations You can use a couple of basic techniques to help you with this process: The Discussion section is sort of an odd beast because it is here where you speculate, but must avoid rambling, guessing, or making logical leaps beyond what is reasonably supported for your data.
For that reason, I often write it with my eyes closed, without looking at the results. Another possible explanation for the apparent discrepancy is a sampling bias of extracellular recordings toward highly active neurons40, raising the concern that calcium dye loading might be biased as well, penetrating preferably into subtypes of neurons with unique response profiles.
Relate your findings to the issues you raised in the introduction. So the problem of the discussion chapter is a problem of creative thinking and confidence, but there are some stylistic conventions and knowledge issues that complicate the task.
To further develop the snowflake, Wendy will write at least four points under each subhead, to make paragraph headings. Many people find talking an easier way to get ideas out. Use each of these points as a prompt to write a short paragraph on why.
This is a stylistic choice — there is no right or wrong way to do it, but the diagram lets you imagine different results and discuss the implications of the various choices. Our main finding consists of highly heterogeneous local populations with relatively large correlations between a minority of neighboring neurons.
Results can take the form of data, hypotheses, models, definitions, formulas, etc. Sometimes forcing yourself to argue the reverse position can highlight the relationships or ideas worth exploring. So I suggested we try using a matrix. Many students try to make their research fit into the IMRAD format, when it is not appropriate to do so.
At first, these data seem difficult to reconcile with numerous studies showing smooth, large-scale tonotopic organization in A1 for example, see A1 tonotopy in ferrets19, mice8, rats18 and monkeys An ethnographer might devote a chapter to each theory they have built from observation.
The book suggests that you write this list with the help of a sympathetic listener who knows the project, like a supervisor. These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters. Please feel free to add your advice or questions in the comments below.
How would the machine work? For example, an artist may discuss each project and what it means separately. Other studies revealing tonotopy using imaging techniques such as intrinsic imaging7, 42 or voltage-sensitive dyes43 averaged responses over many neurons and are prone to overlook the local heterogeneity that we found here.
Now that we know what your research results are, what are other interesting questions we should address? It should accomplish 2 things: This can feel risky because, if you have been approaching the thesis in the right spirit, you are likely to be experiencing Doubt.
If you are feeling anxious about the discussion section rest assured you are not alone.12 Steps to Write an Effective Discussion Chapter. November 5, by Dissertation Genius.
This article gives doctoral dissertation students valuable guidance on how to go about writing their Discussion chapter. The article starts by outlining the main goals and writing approaches. Do not use an apologetic tone in this section.
Every study. Writing a discussion section is where you really begin to add your interpretations to the work. The difficult discussion chapter.
April 20, The discussion section is scary because you have to make new knowledge claims of your own, How to write a Better Thesis suggests that you start the discussion by simply writing a huge list of everything you learned about your topic – these are your provisional conclusions, observations.
How to write a Discussion chapter for your thesis or dissertation I noticed that the Discussion chapter is one of the hardest to write, especially when you are so close to the results and your head is wrapped up in all the data. Thesis Writing in the Sciences.
Intro: Lit Review; Scientific Style ; Writing the Discussion. The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the. Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate].Download